Learning
Histories
The
Mind of the Program
An Idea Takes
Hold
The program's concept arose as a result of some information Leland
Kaiser, internationally recognized health care futurist, shared
about community health and its effects during a speech in early
1993. By spring of 1993, a task force of representatives from various
parts of the hospital and the community began to focus attention
on the congregational nursing concept. Their first task was to develop
a proposal to present to the hospital's administration. The proposal
outlined what the program would look like and how it would be shaped
in this community.
Congregational
Nursing is based on the theory that parishoners will be more likely
to contact and seek advice from a congregational nurse (who is readily
available and dedicated to listening to them) than they would their
minister or personal physician. The congregational nurse often sees
the problems much earlier and can help.
Mark Chambers,
Memorial Health Foundation Vice President, was part of the task
force and remembers that, "there were several questions that
we wanted to answer in the formation of our proposal. They included:
how do we identify the congregations?; how do you identify the nurse?;
how do we fund the nurses?; what will the nurses actually do?; how
can we evaluate this program?"
In order to learn
more about the concept itself and to answers some of these questions,
the task force contacted Lutheran General Hospital in Park Ridge,
Illinois, the pioneer of parish nursing. The task force acquired
information and materials that helped them create a job description,
budget and other information critical to the proposal. They modeled
the congregational nursing program after the one at Lutheran General
Hospital.
Getting Started
Even though they had the information from a successful program there
were still issues that arose as a result of their own program formulation
process. First, the issue of the nurse's employer presented itself.
Would the hospital or the religious institution be the employer
of the nurse?
As they began to
develop the nurse's job description the second issue arose. Because
they would be asking nurses to perform non-clinical types of activities
(with a religious base), the job description would be different
from that of a traditional registered nurse. How would they deal
with this issue?
And finally, the
task force structure itself added an interesting dimension. The
task force included a couple of nurse practitioners who may have
been interested in acting in the congregational nursing capacity.
This created some tension within the task force.
It took the task
force approximately four months to develop a framework for the Congregational
Nursing Program. In August 1993, the task force presented their
proposal to the Community Health Advisory Group (CHAG) who approved
funding for partnerships through the hospital's Community Benefit
Fund (tithing policy). According to Mary Sweet Rooney, Director
of Pastoral and Social Services and one of the founding members
of the task force, "the committee approved the project and
we were off and running."
The Letter
Mary Sweet Rooney and her predecessor and co-initiator, Ella Goodman,
signed a letter dated August 16, 1993 that was sent to 230 churches
and synagogues. Click
here for an except from the letter.
That initial letter
received only three responses. According to Mary Rooney, "It
was very hard sell. People didn't know what in the world a nurse
would be doing in a congregation. They couldn't even imagine how
he or she would be used or even helpful to the congregation. This
was such a new concept that people were skeptical about its effectiveness
and need. Many just didn't see the connection between a nurse and
the congregation."
In order to bring
awareness to the community and to try and recruit more congregations,
Mary Rooney and the newly hired Coordinator of Congregational Nursing,
Sara Hake, spoke throughout the community at area churches, synagogues,
Rotary and Lions club meetings and anywhere else someone would listen.
They even resorted to inviting themselves places.
"The initial
recruiting months were extremely difficult. We tried everything
to get people to listen and open up to the idea, we even came with
healthy snacks," confesses Sara Hake. "You have to be
persistent and willing to work hard to get people interested. It
doesn't come naturally or quickly."
The three original
respondents to the letter included two churches and one synagogue.
Mary Rooney recalls that, "just getting these congregations
signed-on was a challenge. It took a long time." There were
many different factors that played a role in this delay. The church/synagogue
politics and structures were each very different. Getting the partnership
agreement through all the administrative and political authorities
at each religious institution was difficult. There was a lot of
questioning from the institutions. Many wanted to know what was
in it for Memorial Hospital and why Memorial Hospital was even interested
in offering this program.
According to Sara
Hake, "the more we de-institutionalized the idea of community
health and congregational nursing the more receptive the religious
institutions became. The fact that the nurse is an employee of Memorial
Hospital was accepted because her job function, direction and duties
would come from the religious institution itself."
The Congregational
Nursing Program staff emphasized the need for a spiritual base for
wellness and health. They assured religious leaders that returning
health and wellness to a religious base was a very logical and practical
thing to do. Historically, religion and healing have been closely
connected. By participating with area churches and synagogues, Memorial
and the Congregational Nursing Program witness to the strong link
between faith, health and healing. It took some time to get the
word out, but as more and more learned about Congregational Nursing,
more and more churches and synagogues became interested.
|